Which costs are changing, and what is driving the change?
Connect financial movements to volume, activity, location, customer, product or operational drivers where the data supports it.
Cost and profitability questions become difficult when finance data is separated from the commercial and operational activity that creates it. A P&L can show the result without showing the business drivers that explain the result.
We support organizations connect financial, sales, volume, expense and operational data into governed analytical views that support more precise performance management and better conversations between finance and the business.
Use these pathways to see how the same finance capability supports executive decisions about performance, operations, technology and value.
We frame the engagement around the process, control and information questions finance leaders need to resolve before selecting a solution.
Connect financial movements to volume, activity, location, customer, product or operational drivers where the data supports it.
Design the right levels of detail so leaders can identify differences across locations, business lines or operating units.
Align KPIs and data structures so operational explanations reconcile with financial reporting.
Create drill paths and analytical views that move from headline results to the underlying cost and activity drivers.
The exact scope depends on the organization, but the work typically produces a combination of these outputs.
A review of financial, commercial and operational sources required to analyze cost and performance.
A governed structure connecting financial outcomes to relevant entities such as location, product, customer, service or business line.
Consistent measures and definitions for monitoring cost, contribution and profitability where supported by available data.
Views that support finance and operating leaders understand changes over time and differences across units.
Layered reporting that supports both management-level performance review and detailed investigation.
Checks that maintain consistency between analytical outputs and governed finance sources.
This example is drawn from the documented Global Data & BI case-study portfolio and illustrates the kind of process, data and reporting conditions behind the service.
The healthcare engagement consolidated D365 and legacy information into a governed BI environment covering P&L, cost analysis, expenses, sales, volumes and operational control. The solution gave leadership a common basis for comparing performance across locations and examining the operational context behind financial results.
Read the case studyThese services often intersect in the same finance transformation program, but each has a distinct purpose and page.
Finance work can begin as focused advisory and continue into project delivery, embedded support or an ongoing managed model.
Focused executive and specialist support for assessments, design decisions and finance transformation direction.
Read more →Structured delivery when the finance design needs to move into implementation, integration, rollout and adoption.
Read more →Specialists operating alongside finance and technology teams when continuity and critical-period support matter.
Read more →Connect directly with the people responsible for this work. Explore their experience and contact options.


Share the reporting, planning, control or operating challenge, the teams involved and the systems currently in use. Our teams can determine where process, data, governance, analytics or automation work should begin.